CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OF
APRIL 22, 2008
AMENDMENTS and SUBSTITUTES
Compiled by: Research Division
07-401	Amendment	(Finance) Includes the provisions of the Rules Committee amendment; additionally requires that all proceeds of sale or other disposition of the old Duval County Courthouse, or City Hall Annex on East Bay Street, or adjacent waterfront property, be promptly used for the retirement of City debt incurred for the Duval County Unified Courthouse Program, and not solely for the renovation of the former federal courthouse building and related adjacent improvements as establish in prior ordinance.
		(Rules) Requires that the Mayor seek advice and counsel from the Chief Judge and Council President during execution of the Duval County Unified Courthouse Program, and in the removal, selection, or replacement of the executive project manager; also provides for such advice and counsel to facilitate compliance with funding restrictions set forth herein, as well as the functionality and longevity of the new unified courthouse program.
08-109	Amendment	Includes recommended PUD condition (development to proceed in accordance with Development Services Division memorandum dated March 5, 2008, or as otherwise approved by the Planning and Development Department).
08-206	Amendment	Strikes various references to the candidates for office being Robert J. Harms and Theresa Graham; provides for filling of the seat by election as instructed by the Circuit Court.
08-217	Amendment	Provides for a Revised Exhibit 1 (Land Trade Agreement), which clarifies that Imeson Holdings, LLC, shall be responsible for the maintenance of the new stormwater facility in perpetuity.
08-223	Amendment	Clarifies that certain referenced “units” are “apartment units;” provides for a revised fair share agreement, which attaches a revised exhibit to the contract to correct ownership information.
08-224	Amendment	Attaches as Exhibit 3 a memorandum from the JEDC Director regarding the project; provides for a Revised Exhibit 2 (development agreement), which deletes “scope of performance and development” from the technical amendments within the agreement.
08-231	Amendment	Per the Office of General Counsel, the Amendment incorporates a revised PUD Site Plan dated April 4, 2008 and a revised PUD Written Description dated March 26, 2008, and adds the following conditions to the PUD: development shall be subject to the Development Services Division transportation memorandum dated March 5, 2008, or as otherwise approved by the Planning and Development Department; and the JTA requires an ADA accessible sidewalk along Merrill Road.
08-233	Amendment	Per the Office of General Counsel, the Amendment adds the following conditions to the PUD: development shall be subject to the Development Services Division transportation memorandum dated March 10, 2008, or as otherwise approved by the Planning and Development Department; and development shall be subject to the Current Planning Division design guideline memorandum dated April 11, 2008.

08-235	Amendment	Per the Office of General Counsel, the Amendment attaches a revised Exhibit 2 (Future Land Use Map) to limit development on the subject property to 15,000 square feet of light industrial uses, and corrects the reference to R.E. #000991-1000 to indicate that the subject property is only a portion of R.E. #000991-1000.
08-245	Amendment	Per the Office of General Counsel, the Amendment incorporates a revised PUD Written Description dated February 15, 2008 and a revised PUD Site Plan dated February 24, 2007 and adds the following conditions to the PUD: development shall be subject to the Development Services Division transportation memorandum dated March 13, 2008, or as otherwise approved by the Planning and Development Department; and a landscape and buffer plan consistent with certain industrial buffer planting details shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning and Development Department at the time of verification of substantial compliance of the PUD.
08-307	Amendment	Revises provision granting flexibility to the Mayor by removing reference to “widest” flexibility and providing that action is to be within the constraints of the City’s current debt swap policy; revises provision that the outstanding amount of the authorized bonds shall not be increased except as necessary to provide any funded debt service reserves and costs of issuance of the refunding or restructuring by omitting reference to capitalized interest for not more than 2 years; requires that final maturity of the outstanding authorized bonds shall not be extended beyond the maturity date of the original issued bonds (rather than beyond 30 years after the date of restructuring or refunding); requires that the restructuring or refunding be consistent with the City’s current Debt and Swap Policy, omitting language allowing for exceptions as “provided herein.”