OFFICE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL
117 WEST DUVAL STREET, SUITE 425
4TH FLOOR, CITY HALL
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32202
904-630-1377
Neighborhoods,
Community Investments and Services Committee
Special Meeting
Minutes
January 3, 2017
Location:
City Council Chamber, 1st
floor, City Hall – St. James Building; 117 West Duval Street
In attendance:
Council Members Scott Wilson (Chair), Reggie Brown (Vice Chair), Doyle Carter, Garrett Dennis, Bill Gulliford,
Joyce Morgan. Council President Lori Boyer
was in attendance.
Also:
Kyle Billy – Council Auditor’s Office; Peggy Sidman – Office of General Counsel; Jeff Clements and
John J. Jackson – Council Research Division; Juliette Williams – Legislative
Services Division; Jordan Elsbury – Mayor’s Office
Meeting Convened:
9:34 a.m.
The topic for the Special Meeting was Historic Preservation
Review Process for Blighted Properties.
Autumn Martinage, City Planner, Planning & Development
Department, made the PowerPoint presentation.
Ms. Martinage explained that her staff reviewed blighted
properties that the Municipal Code
Compliance Division referred to them.
The properties had to be at least 50 years old. She provided statistics on the total number
of property addresses reviewed since February 2015 and the number of them that
had been determined to be of historic significance.
When Municipal Code Compliance refer property addresses to
the Planning Department, a base file is created with information on whether the
property is in a historic district or has been designated as a landmark; other
information include photos, permit records, Property Appraiser information,
Sanborn Fire Insurance maps and other miscellaneous information. Staff visits the site and surrounding areas
to ascertain architectural consistency.
Research for the property address attempts to determine who lived on the
property and if any of the residents were individuals of note.
The final determining factors on whether a structure of any historical significance
include: if the property is located within the boundaries of a National
Register or is a locally designated historic district; if the property has been
designated as a local landmark; if the property is the work of a noted
architect or builder; and if the property is an excellent example of its
architectural style.
Ms. Martinage explained the origin of the 50 year benchmark
rule.
The Chair, Council Member Scott Wilson, had asked Ms.
Martinage and her staff to review specific properties located in his Council District. Staff visited and reviewed properties in
Glynlea and 548 Brunswick Road, in particular.
Pictures were taken and the property’s history was reviewed. The
PowerPoint had pictures of the property that Ms. Martinage described and
discussed.
Council Member Reggie Brown wanted to know if there had been
any suggestions of how to preserve the
character of a neighborhood besides the designation as a historic district,
with all of the restrictions that that designation entailed. Ms. Martinage indicated that there were
several designations that could be considered including a conservation district
or listing on the National Registry.
Council Member Bill Gulliford commented that all
designations are subjective. How do we determine if a structure is notable or
if an individual is noteworthy? When Ms.
Martinage suggested that the staff relies on the experience of long time
Historic Preservation Planner Joel
McEachin, Mr. Gulliford suggested that with all due respect to Mr. McEachin’s
experience and knowledge, it is still a subjective decision being made.
Mr. Gulliford thought that there should be input from the
Neighborhoods Department, Housing Division, Code Enforcement and others. He invited staff in the audience to the
podium to share their thoughts and to field questions.
Diana Seydlorksy, Chief, Housing Division, stated that her
division’s work with properties had to be in compliance with State statutes and
U.S. Department of the Interior’s guidelines.
She also underscored how the cost of rehabilitation work on properties
was affected by historic designation.
Brian Mosier, Chief, Municipal Code and Compliance, shared
his views on Jacksonville’s policy on blighted structure and structures of
historic significance. He indicated that
the challenge is preserving historic structures but not if the condition of the
structures threatens public safety. He
said that the City makes every effort to
preserve the historic fabric of communities.
He agreed that Jacksonville should assess what other cities do on the
matters of the preservation of historic structures or the demolition of
blighted structures, but the assessment should be on cities that are similar to
Jacksonville such as Savannah, Georgia or Charleston, South Carolina.
There being no further business, the Special Meeting was
adjourned at 10:37 a.m.
John J. Jackson, Council Research Division (904) 630-1729
01.05.17
Posted: 12:00 p.m.