OFFICE OF
CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL AGENDA OF FEBRUARY 14, 2012 |
||
|
||
AMENDMENTS
and SUBSTITUTES |
||
Compiled by: Research Division |
||
|
||
|
|
|
11-308 |
Amendment |
Makes
findings concerning sufficiency and application of criteria; denies the
appeal. |
|
|
|
11-309 |
Amendment |
Makes
findings concerning sufficiency and application of criteria; denies the
appeal. |
|
|
|
11-589 |
Amendment |
Per
OGC, the Amendment adds the following conditions to the PUD: (1) The subject
property shall be developed in accordance with the Development Services
Division Memorandum dated October 6, 2011, or as otherwise approved by the
Planning and Development Department. With respect to comment number 3, access
directly across from Grayfield Drive shall not be counted as
right-in/right-out driveway. Additionally, the traffic signal shall not be
required if it is determined not to be warranted based on the result of a
traffic study undertaken by the applicant and approved by the Planning and
Development Department, all of which shall take place prior to issuance of
the first building permit for vertical construction on the Subject Property;
(2) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each outparcel, that
portion of the internal access road or roads shown on the Site Plan that
provide frontage for the outparcel shall be constructed. For example, occupancy of the easternmost
outparcel is conditioned upon the portion of the access road fronting the
entire northern and eastern edges of the outparcel
being completed. Occupancy of the
first outparcel located adjacent to
and fronting the right-in, right-out connection shown on the Site Plan shall
also be conditioned upon construction of an internal access road connecting
to the east-west internal access road shown on the Site Plan. Upon completion of the entire internal
vehicular access road connecting Collins Road on the easterly portion of the
property and Plantation Bay Drive, as depicted on the Site Plan, such
internal vehicular access road shall be opened and maintained for use as an
approved private street or if accepted by the City, as an approved public
street; and (3) All sag lenses, drop lenses and convex lenses shall be
prohibited. Illumination levels at all
property lines shall not exceed one half foot candles when the building or
parking areas are located adjacent to residential areas and shall not exceed
one foot candle when abutting other non-residential properties. All lighting lamp sources within the
parking and pedestrian areas shall be metal halide or compact
florescent. The maximum light pole
height in all parking areas should not exceed thirty feet. An exterior lighting design plan for each
project, including a photometrics plan, pole and fixture schedules shall be
submitted at the time of verification of substantial compliance for review
and approval by the Planning and Development Department. |
|
|
|
11-612 |
Amendment |
Makes
findings concerning sufficiency and application of criteria; grants the
appeal; remands the matter for entry of a consistent order. |
|
|
|
11-613 |
Amendment |
Makes
findings concerning sufficiency and application of criteria; grants the
appeal; remands the matter for entry of a consistent order. |
|
|
|
11-614 |
Amendment |
Makes
findings concerning sufficiency and application of criteria; grants the
appeal; remands the matter for entry of a consistent order. |
|
|
|
11-755 |
Amendment |
Per
OGC, the Amendment incorporates a revised PUD Written Description, dated
January 19, 2012, and adds the following conditions to the PUD: (1) The
subject property shall be developed in accordance with the Development
Services Division Memorandum dated December 16, 2011; or as otherwise
approved by the Planning and Development Department; and (2) Multi-family
residential development shall be consistent with the minimum lot, maximum lot
coverage and minimum yard and maximum height requirements of the RMD-D zoning
district. |
|
|
|
11-763 |
Amendment |
Per
OGC, the Amendment changes the name of the trust to be consistent throughout
the legislation. |
|
|
|
11-765 |
Amendment |
Provides
for a Revised Exhibit 1 (FY 2012-2013 Public Service Grant Council Priority
Populations Recommendations and FY 2013 Priority Populations Ordinance Filing
Timeline). |
|
|
|
11-766 |
Substitute |
(RCDPHS)
Includes Rules Committee substitute provisions; clarifies requirements
concerning a bank draft or check contemporaneously with a sales transaction;
clarifies exclusion of certain transactions involving specified sellers. |
|
|
|
|
Substitute |
(R)
Revises definitions; deletes transportation permit requirement; deletes time
limit on issuance of checks for sale of materials; prohibits purchase of
restricted regulated metals and omits certain references to regulated metals;
requires Sheriff to provide software and updates to meet any State
requirements for electronic reporting at no cost to a licensed dealer and
provides for use of another format approved by the Sheriff; clarifies proof
of ownership provisions; provides for consideration of degree and materiality
of a violation; clarifies presumption and intent relative to penalties and
remedies; deletes references to attorneys’ fees and costs; requires a report,
including supporting documentation, to Council no later than January 31st
each year concerning the Sheriff’s assessment of effectiveness; provides for
sunset on March 1, 2015, unless Council takes action to reenact; makes other
technical and administrative changes. |
|
|
|
12-3 |
Amendment |
Provides
for a Revised Exhibit 1 (amended resume). |
|
|
|
12-4 |
Amendment |
Provides
for a Revised Exhibit 1 (amended resume). |
|
|
|
12-7 |
Amendment |
Reflects
replacement of Catherine Childers; omits reference to December 1, 2011, as
term commencement date. |
|
|
|
12-8 |
Amendment |
Reflects
replacement of Bernard E. Smith. |
|
|
|
12-20 |
Amendment |
Per
OGC, the Amendment incorporates a revised PUD Written Description, dated
December 21, 2011, and corrects the date of the PUD Site Plan. |
|
|
|
12-27 |
Amendment |
Provides
for a Revised Exhibit 1 (amended BT); attaches the required certification as
Exhibit 2. |
|
|
|
12-30 |
Amendment |
Per
OGC, the Amendment attaches a Revised Exhibit 1, which removes documents
inadvertently attached to the development agreement. |
|
|
|
12-33 |
Amendment |
Provides
for a Revised Exhibit 1 (2012 Jacksonville Project, including budget);
provides for a Revised Exhibit 2 (advertisements); attaches a Revised Exhibit
3 (Orange County Industrial Development Authority minutes and resolution); includes
a recital concerning public hearings and minutes; states that a public
hearing was held by the Jacksonville City Council on January 24, 2012; provides
for a Revised Exhibit 4 (interlocal agreement); references and attaches as
Exhibit 5 the memorandum of agreement; includes and defines authority to make
“technical amendments” (rather than “minor changes”). |
|
|
|
12-38 |
Amendment |
Attaches
extension agreements as Exhibit 1 and authorizes execution in substantially
the form attached (rather than authorizing execution of related contracts and
documents, and the taking of necessary action). |
|
|
|
12-40 |
Amendment |
(RCDPHS)
Includes Rules Committee amendment provisions; renames to “Curtis Lee Johnson
Marina Boat Ramp.” |
|
|
|
|
Amendment |
(Rules)
Renames “Lighthouse Marine Boat Ramp” rather than “Lighthouse Marina;”
corrects street reference (“Avenue” rather than “Boulevard); corrects Council
District reference (“9” rather than “10”). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact: Jeff Clements, Chief of Research (904)
630-1405 or jeffc@coj.net