OFFICE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL
117 WEST DUVAL STREET,
SUITE 425
4TH FLOOR, CITY HALL
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32202
904-630-1377
JOINT
LUZ AND TEU SPECIAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
City
Council Chamber, 1st floor, City Hall
March
12, 2018
2:00
p.m.
Location: City Council
Chamber, City Hall – St. James Building, 117 West Duval Street
In attendance:
Council Members Lori Boyer (Chair), Al Ferraro, Joyce Morgan, Tommy Hazouri,
Aaron Bowman, Jim Love, John
Crescimbeni, Danny Becton
Also: Paige Johnston – Office of General Counsel; Heather
Reber and Kim Taylor – Council Auditor’s Office; Yvonne P. Mitchell – Council
Research Division
Meeting Convened:
2:02 p.m.
Council Member Lori Boyer called the meeting to order and the
attendees introduced themselves for the record. CM Boyer clarified that the
meetings are workshops and do not require the attendance of members from both
standing committees. The purpose of the meeting is to review and gather
information about to pending legislation 2017-863.
Mr. Jason Teal briefed the members on the content of the legislation
which is a substitute for Chapter 711,
Florid Statutes. This workshop focuses on subpart
C as it relates to the regulation of small wireless facilities. Approximately
year ago, the Florida Legislature amended the statutes to require local
governments to allow the location and co-location of small wireless facilities
in public rights-of-way. However, local governments may provide input on design
standards. Also, they are subject to
limitations in determining the maximum heights allowed and placement of
separate pole instead of utilizing existing pole. Mr. Teal stated that he and
Ms. Lawsikia Hodges researched other jurisdictions (Orlando, Tampa,
Hillsborough County, Leon County, City of Miami and Atlantic Beach) and spoken
with various county attorneys regarding drafting and implementing the best plan.
The process will require registration and permit
component. Businesses must first register with the City of Jacksonville. Before
installation, the service provider must apply for a permit to determine the
logistics (location, height, design) of the SWF. Within this component, the company
must provide supporting evidence to utilize a different pole rather than the
existing pole. The City can receive $150.00 annually per SWF located on City-owned infrastructure. There are no other
fees that the City may charge.
It should be noted that the majority of infrastructure within the
typical rights-of-way are the street lights which are the property of JEA. As a
municipal-owned electric facility, JEA is
exempt from abiding by the regulations per the Florida Statutes. The City does
own some infrastructure in rights-of-way. In 1978, the City and JEA created a
Street Light Tariff Agreement which identifies various types of infrastructure
and its ownership. JEA is currently processing applications for third-party
providers requesting to utilize their infrastructure.
There was extensive discussion regarding the ascetics of the
SWFs. CM Crescimbeni requested that
organizations such as CPACs, Visit Jacksonville, and City Beautiful are invited
to the meetings to participate in the discussion. Per his request, Mr. Teal
agreed to send CM Crescimbeni the section of the statute that references the
exemption of utility companies. CM Boyer requested that Mr. Teal review the
tariff agreement and the statutory exemption
to determine whether the City has the initial authority to regulate standards,
including JEA design parameters; and whether the contract with JEA permits a
unique provision. None action from the Council would allow all entities
unregulated access to the infrastructure. Per CM Bowman’s inquiry, Mr. Teal
stated that the Council needs to decide on objective design standards for the
SWF for equipment co-located on existing infrastructure and the cosmetics of the
new free-standing
pole; the physical location of SWFs; and
the review of the application process. CM
Hazouri requested the amount the City received from the tariff agreement. He
suggested that a special design is created to ensure the aesthetics of all
areas, especially historic districts, are maintained. Mr. Teal confirmed that
JEA is currently reviewing approximately 210 applications to locate SWF on
their infrastructure. CM Becton inquired about the status of state road
rights-of-way. Mr. Teal commented that infrastructure on state roads is handled
separately. CM Boyer requested
clarification on whether adjacent private properties with homeowner associations (HOA) are exempt from
the public rights-of-way. CM Crescimbeni suggested that undergrounding language
is added to the legislation as a forward-thinking
measure. In regards a collective HOA, CM Crescimbeni requested information on
the City’s ability to establish one for areas without governance.
Ms. Hodges shared that the pending legislation covers two new subparts,
currently not in our existing ordinance. The two new subparts are small wireless
facilities and small wireless utility poles. Since the design standards are
different, it was best to have separate categories. Some of the proposed
amendments to Chapter 711 include the registration of communication services
providers every two years, more stringent insurance requirements, improved performance
bond requirement, and an increase of security fund fee. Ms. Hodges agreed to research the City’s
ability to require undergrounding instead of installing new infrastructure as
it relates to the Florida Statute.
Jordan Pope, JEA, briefly explained that the Street Light Tariff
Agreement includes the rate the City pays JEA for the electric services for
street lights.
Gary Vondrasek, JEA Telecom Service &
Sales, shared that applications are being reviewed for co-location on JEA
infrastructure. Currently, three SWF have been installed at this time. There
are several executed master agreements with service providers with companies
such as Verizon, Spirit, AT&T, and T-Mobile. He stated that JEA has
uniformed and discreet design standards. Mr. Vondrasek
was requested to submit copies of the design standards to the committee. Some
of the standards require an antenna at the top of the pole, an equipment cabinet, and an electric disconnect. There was
some discussion regarding the size of the equipment cabinet. Since JEA has
existing contracts with service providers, the question remains whether the
City has the authority to regulate the entire right-of-way. Mr. Vondrasek clarified that site licenses for SWF are separate
from the master agreements and reviewed on a case by case. The locations for
the three SWF are Wildwood Road, Collins Road, and Old Kings Road South. Mr. Vondrasek agreed to send pictures and actual addresses for
each SWF.
Mr. Pope stated that JEA wants to work with the committee to create uniformed and discreet design standards that
are most appropriate for the needs of the City. Thus, JEA would temporarily
stop approving site licenses until the joint committee completed its work with
the pending legislation.
In response to CM Becton’s inquiry, Mr. Vondrasek
commented that JEA owns approximately 150,000 electric distribution poles and
60,000 standalone street light poles. This is a huge opportunity for
co-location and has been discussed with the various service providers. The SWF
is geared toward providing 5G service. Therefore, it is expected that a large
number of SWF will be requested. It is the expectation that all applications
can be approved for co-location with a minimum
request for new infrastructure. Mr. Vondrasek stated that JEA’s rates ($1,200 per location)
were negotiated before the change in the Florida Statute.
Bill Ferry, Comcast, requested clarification on whether existing
wireline facilities would have to adhere to the additional permitting and
requirements addressed in the pending legislation. He shared that the wireline
facilities are different than the wireless facilities and additional
requirements may impact service to the community. It should be noted that these
wireline facilities are utilizing micro wireless facilities (small equipment
boxes) and currently operating in the ROW.
Mr. Tracy Hatch, AT&T, provided comments on several sections of
the pending legislation. He stated that the three options listed under Section
711.431 were problematic and did not meet the aesthetic requirement of the
statute. He stated that service providers are only required to blend
infrastructure into the existing background not improve the area with added
features. Mr. Hatch commented that the law does not permit local governments to
dictate a provider to use a specific pole or any class of pole. Mr. Hatch
stated that the statutes allow providers to utilize
poles in the public ROW even if an HOA governs the private roads. Also, he
shared that the City cannot require multiple locations
of SWF on one pole. CM Crescimbeni requested Mr. Hatch to submit a copy of
AT& T cabinet and equipment. Mr. Hatch explained that capacity areas are
targeted to handle large technology needs. The SWF is being utilized to broadcast better coverage for a concentrated
area with capital improvement development.
As it relates to the three installed SWF, CM Becton requested to
information from JEA regarding the reasons for approving those specific
locations. Mr. Mike Sands confirmed that
an exemption is available for drainage through tree mitigation requirements. CM
Boyer will follow up with Mr. Teal regarding a list of items to discuss at next
meeting which include development standards from the City and JEA; city permits
from the three SWF locations; and whether fees can be charged under the tree
mitigation requirements in addition to the $150 annual service fee. CM Crescimbeni requested a copy of the
suggested checklist provided by the Municipal Lawyers Association to incorporate
in pending legislation.
The next meeting will be noticed on
March 26, 2018.
Meeting adjourned: 4:09 p.m.
The written minutes of this
meeting are only an overview of what was discussed. The following items have
been submitted for the public record.
Please contact legislative services for these items.
Minutes: Yvonne P. Mitchell, Council Research
03.22.18 Posted 1:00 p.m.
Tapes: Joint LUZ and TEU Special
Committee Meeting – LSD
03.12.18